docs: propose proof-carrying findings#276
Draft
PhysShell wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
P-035 — Proof-carrying findings and replayable derivation certificates;PRG001/ Own.Progress;docs/proposals/README.md.Why
Own.NET already emits human-readable evidence and ordered paths, but those are still produced by the same analyzer that computed the verdict. This proposal records a narrower and more defensible next step: selected deterministic findings may carry replayable derivation certificates checked against canonical facts by an independent bounded verifier.
The intended claim is verified derivation over canonical facts, not “formally proven arbitrary C# bug.”
Impact
Documentation only. No schemas, CLI behavior, diagnostics, verifier, or gates change in this PR.
Validation
mainand touches only the new proposal plus the proposal index;